the Catalyst's 'misrepresentation' of our position shouldn't come as much of a surprise.  as Barbara Bowen correctly foresaw, actions speak louder than words.  it's hard to have it both ways, and we can expect many more instances in the future when we will be clarifying just what we meant by condemning pathways and approving a plan to implement it.
ar



Alex Reichl, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Political Science
Queens College, City University of New York
65-30 Kissena Blvd.
Flushing, NY 11367
Ph: 718.997.5472
Fax: 718.997.5492

-----qcsenate-bounces@lists.qc.cuny.edu wrote: -----
To: qcsenate@qc.edu
From: Roberta.Brody@qc.cuny.edu
Sent by: qcsenate-bounces@lists.qc.cuny.edu
Date: 04/19/2012 10:39AM
Subject: [QCsenate 0033] Inacurate statement inthe The Catalyst

Letter from Senator and UCC Chair  Ken Lord:

-----Forwarded by Roberta Brody/GSLIS/Faculty/Queens College on 04/19/2012 10:32AM -----
To: Jonathan Buchsbaum/Faculty/Queens College@QC
From: Kenneth Lord/CSCI/Faculty/Queens College
Date: 04/19/2012 09:07AM
Subject: Inaccurate statement in The Catalyst

Jonathan,

The Catalyst which I received yesterday is completely inaccurate with respect to the Academic Senate's actions.
At no time has the Senate made any statement approving the Pathways to Degree Completion initiative. Quite to
the contrary, the Senate passed a resolution last November rejecting Pathways on "pedagogical, intellectual,
and legal grounds" and was one of the first governance bodies to do so.

What the Senate approved in April was a required implementation plan describing how the college would go about
putting courses into the Pathways pigeon holes. It was an act of compliance with the Board's resolution, not an
approval of the process.

Professor Bowen's statements made during debate at the April Senate meeting made an erroneous premise and
conclusion that the Senate's approval of the implementation plan (a product of hours of work by a Senate committee
comprised of faculty, staff and students) implied that the Senate approved of Pathways as a whole, which, as I
have said, is very far from the truth. That misinformation has now been turned into print and distributed to the College
community.

Now that the damage is done I think it is the responsibility of the editors of The Catalyst to print and distribute an
immediate retraction and explanation.

The Senate's motion condemning Pathways may be found at
http://www.qc.cuny.edu/Academics/AcademicSenate/Documents/111110.pdf

Thank you for your attention,

Ken Lord, Chair

Academic Senate Undergraduate Curriculum Committee

=======================================
Dr. Kenneth Lord
Assistant to the Provost for Educational Technology (www.qc.cuny.edu/edtech)
Chair, Undergraduate Curriculum Committee
Lecturer, Computer Science
Queens College, CUNY



Roberta Brody PhD
Professor
Graduate School of Library and Information Studies
Queens College, City University of New York
Roberta.Brody@QC.cuny.edu (work)
bobbybrody@aol.com (home)
718 997-3790


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the
recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return
email message and delete all copies of the original communication. Thank
you for your cooperation.

_______________________________________________
QCsenate mailing list
QCsenate@lists.qc.cuny.edu
To unsubscribe or change your preferences goto http://lists.qc.cuny.edu/mailman/listinfo/qcsenate


-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This communication (including any attachments) is intended solely for the
recipient(s) named above and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged or legally protected. Any unauthorized use or dissemination of
this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return
email message and delete all copies of the original communication. Thank
you for your cooperation.